These comments are all - IN MY HUMBLE OPINION - and can be completely ignored.
BMW M3 E46 (bought April 2001)
ENGINE: 3245cc 6 cyls in line - 343 bhp at 7900 rpm
PERFORMANCE: Maximum speed 174mph (limiter turned off)
0-60 mph 4.8 secs. 30-70 mph 4.3 secs - 60-0 mph - 2.6 secs
Standing quarter mile 13.4 (107 mph at 1/4 mile)
WEIGHT: Much too much.
Carter's Comments: Massive grip on the road - good/progressive acceleration and wide torque band. DSC too harsh and ready to cut the power, yet switching it off (on the road) requires an experienced driver or a fool. Vague steering and a lack of road 'feel' compromise the drive and it's way too bouncy on track. Great engine note and point to point as quick as a 911 (non turbo) cross country (especially in the wet). Good internal & boot space, finish and build quality. Brakes HOPELESS on track (will fade after 3 laps of spirited driving), but just about perfect for the road. A very good 'all round' road car... but probably not as good as the M5. (The 3 chassis is nothing like as good as the 5 in my opinion - but then it is a lot cheaper.) It's not a track car unless you have money to burn on tyres and brake pads and don't mind being overtaken- the car is about 400kg too heavy. With DSC off on an open airfield or track it's a real hoot doing the back end out bit (and is bloody good at it - as long as you are happy to buy new back tyres each day). As you may know I had a spat with BMW as the gearbox/flywheel/clutch died on a trackday and BMW refused to cover repairs through the warranty- this was resolved only after Autocar, Auto Express, Top Gear and others championed the cause - I finally got a letter from the boss of BMW GB telling me that BMW would henceforth cover all BM cars for track use. They also paid all my costs and gave me £1000 to shut up (result!). Verdict: A blimmin' great road car - proper 4 seater - great value for money and decent residuals. Just don't take it on track without upping the brakes. Oh, and in town, nobody lets you out of junctions...... as - remember - you're driving the devil's spawn. VIDEO - 1.2 mb WMV of the M3 at Bruntingthorpe: (Right Click 'Save Target As): here Needing a quick point to point proper four seater with a big boot... I bought another in 2005. Interestingly, 6 years after it was introduced 'Evo' (Jan 2006) still think it's the class leader, seeing off the Merc and the new RS4. BMW M3 E46 (bought December 2005) |
CATERHAM SEVEN R500 (bought May 2002)
ENGINE:
Caterham developed Rover 1.8 litre K-Series. (Minster Racing Engines)
Capacity: 1,796cc 80mm (bore) x 89.3mm (stroke)
BRAKES:
Front: 254mm lightweight ventilated discs. Caterham/AP Racing 4 pot calipers.
Rear: 228mm solid discs
PERFORMANCE:
Maximum Speed: 150mph. 0-60 3.4 seconds. 0-100-0: 11.4 seconds
WEIGHT: 460 kg (mmmm).
Carter's Comments: It looks right, it is right. As a track toy and fair weather road car it's as as good as they come (Quick Radicals & Arials now proven quicker on the track, but you can't fit five Tesco bags into the boot) - and whenever you're in a Seven, it's like being in the 'Railway Children' - people smile, wave and let you in. (Try that in a Radical.) Minus points: You need to change the exhaust to get it onto most UK tracks... adding a dustbin sized silencer (see above). It's a bitch to get into in the dry and much MUCH harder if you ever use a roof. It's way too expensive to buy if you load it up with the 'essential' upgraded brakes etc. and will average 8 mpg on track. If you crash on the road, you'll probably die as you are dwarfed by the smallest domestic car. It 'kangaroos' in traffic jams and you get wet all the time. Pass a gritter lorry in winter and you'll still be finding grit in the footwell in summer. The Rover K engine note is so strained at full RPM that you're sure pistons will soon emerge from the bonnet en route to Saturn. Without the windscreen you'll need a skid lid and if you take the doors off you'll get blown apart and deafened by the wind. To get the most from this car you need to 'tinker' with the suspension setup according to surface, temperature and weather. If you're on the wrong tyres in the wet - it's a widow maker. Plus points: It's very, very, very, very, very quick. Now double that and you're not even getting close. It sounds great, it looks great. Its grip in the dry on sticky tyres is breathtaking (literally), cornering at twice the speed you ever thought possible in a road car. All your passengers will get out and say the same word (which begins with F). Buy second hand and you'll have cast iron residuals. Verdict: It's completly stupid - and I really, really miss it. VIDEO: 1.8 mb WMV at Donington Park with other Sevens (Right Click 'Save Target As): here |
PORSCHE 911 TWIN TURBO 996 X50 (bought April 2003)
ENGINE: Straight 6 - 3600cc
Power
|
450
bhp @ 5700 rpm
|
Torque
|
457.0
ft lbs @ 4400 rpm
|
WEIGHT: 1579 kg.
PERFORMANCE:
Top
Speed
|
200+
mph (June 2004)
|
0
- ¼ mile
|
11.8
secs
|
Lateral
Acceleration
|
0.96g
|
0
- 60 mph
|
3.6
secs (sept 02)
|
0
- 100 - 0 mph
|
13.02
secs (sept 02)
|
30 - 70
|
3.3 secs
|
60 - 0
|
2.4 secs
|
Carter's Comments: This car needs little introduction. Forget the headline 450 BHP figure - 457.0 ft lbs torque is the key to this car (available with the X50 'power or 'S' upgrade') - until you've done these numbers on road or (preferably) track, you won't understand what it feels like. Drop the clutch from the line and power is sent to all 4 wheels (as the computer and thus the twin turbos realise you mean business) - you change from first to second at about 60 MPH, and the 'push' is equal to the quickest Caterham. Second and third are fairground rides. Change to fourth and fith and only after 160+ MPH do you start to lose the kick in your back - up to sixth to cruise up to 200 MPH until the rev counter hits max - just wind noise by then, from outside, and any passengers that happen to be along for the ride. But that is the least of this car's abilities. Unless you are a complete klutz it is almost IMPOSSIBLE to put this car into a ditch (with the computer aids on) - and unlike other cars (M3 etc) - the aids don't get in the way, they just sit quietly in the background, not interfering, just ready to save your life if a deer jumps out or a numpty in a panama hat does something stupid. If you really push, the back end will step out from time to time but only if you react like a complete prat will the aids jump in and affect your speed or line. It really is a great grand tourer with enough fizz to sparkle whenever you fancy. The grip in wet or dry is simply stunning. There’s real consistency in the way this car loads up and informs you of changes in surface or grip... giving you ample opportunity to react safely. For road the massive brakes are perfect - but the 1500kg+ weight will mean brakes and rear tyres will suffer on track - rear tyres for this car are EXPENSIVE. Slight niggles: The cabin is a bit dour and not supercar at all - CD and SAT NAV controls are way too fiddly (ESPECIALLY AT SPEED). If you are crusing along in 5th or 6th and suddenly want power, the turbos will take a second or so to cut in - it lacks the instant torque of a big normally aspirated engine - but if you are thrashing, then the turbos know in advance that you need the power so are already spinning 'upstream', thus negating any lag. If you drive it carefully it seems very dull (and you wonder what the fuss was all about). It needs a good thrashing to come alive. With the std exhaust it sounds pretty rubbish (compared with the rest of the 911s)- a third party sports version is available.... but you'll void the warranty. Verdict: Drool. Sorry to my Bank Manager and Accountant. I just had to do it... life is too short. Caviat: You HAVE to be in the right part of the world to own one of these... I moved back to England and sold it immediately. It needs empty roads and I need a licence! VIDEO: 6 mb WMV across the Highest pass in Britain (Right Click 'Save Target As): here |
AUDI QUATTRO RS6 AVANT (bought August 2004)
ENGINE: 4172 cc - V8 - TwinTurbo
450bhp @ 6000-6400 rpm - Torque 413@1950-5600 ( lb / ft )
PERFORMANCE: 0-60 mph 4.4 seconds. Maximum Speed 192 mph (limiter turned off)
WEIGHT: Arggghhhhhhhh.
Carter's Comments: It's an estate car right? Right... much has been written about this car - most of it right. ...Just a few points I'd add. (Vorsprung durch technik)... I can't argue. Very clever adaptive damping makes it more comfortable than my BM5 tourer - at twice the speed. The V8 Twin Turbo makes the best noise I've ever heard from a road car (apart from the TVR Grif 500) and 190 MPH once you get rid of the silly limiter. It's very quick in a straight line, it's huge, heavy, well built, sounds great, will transport 5 people and 2 Great Danes safely at autobahn speeds. Its seating, spec, leather, air con, stereo (et al) is all great, the Sat Nav is however, a bit dodgy. The ride is surprisingly good considering the 245/19 tyres. I also think it's a blimmin' great looking car. I'm constantly surprised at how much of a 'head turner' it is. If you need the quickest way to transport a wardrobe from coast to coast - this is it. From Autocar "There’s only one car that comes close to offering a similar combination of performance with all-wheels driven - Porsche’s 911 Turbo." Personally, I'll take the turbo and send the wardrobe by rail... but life never works out that way, does it. If you need an estate but still want some serious performance this is probably the way to go. Verdict: I dare not take it on track as it is SO heavy. Perfect for a long distance smooch - It's a fat 911. VIDEO: 3.1 mb WMV winter blat through the Lakes (Right Click 'Save Target As): here
|
Land Rover Defender 90 CSW XS TD5 (bought September 2005)
Top
Speed
|
87
mph
|
0
- ¼ mile
|
forever
|
Lateral
Acceleration
|
no
|
0
- 60 mph
|
Tuesday
|
0
- 100 - 0 mph
|
you
ARE kidding right?
|
Carter's Comments:
And now for something completely different. The automotive equivalent of wellington boots.
Great fun off road, on tracks or gravel, through streams, up hills etc. The only classless car one can drive (?)
Not quite, but nearly total pants on the road. XS variant has some creature comforts (air con/electric windows etc)
Perfect for muddy dogs... the lack of any sort of acceleration means the dog will be dry by the time you get home.
Will pull a 2 ton car out of a ditch with ease - 10 forward gears and It doesn't seem to care which one it's in.
Almost unstoppable.
I love it.
THE OTHERS
![]() |
Lotus Elise S1- 118bhp (bought March 2000) Carter's Comments: Very able on track, lots of grip providing confidence to live a little. Feedback from the road & steering superb - the lightweight 'monocoque' design makes the drive very 'informative' - If you run over a coin you know if it's 'heads' or 'tails' up. Rover 'K' series 118 bhp engine not near enough - 165bhp variant probably the one to buy. Early models suffered from dodgy build quality and 'bin end' components. Roof on the S1 a nightmare to attach (and then it leaks). S2 apparently better, but lack of any creature comforts make it difficult to live with on a daily basis. One for the track or a Sunday blat. |
BMW 'MINI' Cooper S (bought November 2002) 165 bhp Carter's Comments: An absolute HOOT on the twisties. Handbrake turns have never been so easy. BMW build quality - but BMW prices. Really let down by lack of straight line performance - even with the 'works package' it's overtaken by vicars on bicycles. Apparently one has been customised to incorporate a BMW E46 343 bhp engine. Now THAT would be fun (until it broke, which I suspect would be almost immediately). Turbo version panned for 2006 - not sure that's the answer... but I'll be reading the reviews. This car deserves some serious poke and some serious thrashing. |
![]() |
Cars on order 2006/2007/2008: Noble M14, AM V8RS, E90 M3 tourer